HMRC has capped penalties for late returns of payment information to contractors under the Construction Industry Scheme. The scheme has proved controversial with contractors. Since 1 October penalties have been capped at £3,000. Before then, however, penalties for failing to register with the scheme were £100 per month and some penalties could amount to tens of thousands of pounds. In some instances where firms had neglected to register in the first place, they were being hit with notices for £20,000 and more. One firm was landed with a penalty of £80,000, which had built up over a year because the firm had failed to register as a contractor.

The new penalty regime came in on 1 October and only applies to penalties levied since that date however if you are faced with penalties under the old regime, contact us today on o800 917 9176 and we will assist you in mitigating these liabilities

HM Treasury will continue in its fight against tax avoidance by the UK’s wealthiest people with the recruitment of an additional 2,250 tax inspectors.

Speaking at the Liberal Democrats annual conference in Birmingham, Danny Alexander, chief secretary to the Treasury, confirmed that the additional HMRC staff will move into new anti-evasion and avoidance jobs targeting around 350,000 taxpayers.

More than 1,000 of these new HMRC roles are being advertised this month.

Mr Alexander said: “These [350,000 wealthiest taxpayers] are the people who pay or should pay the 50p rate of tax. And my message to the small minority who don’t pay what they owe is simple, I agree with the Chancellor. ‘We will find you and your money’ and you will pay your fair share.”

Alexander also said that this package was already bearing fruit: “I promised you we’d collect an extra £7bn a year by the end of the Parliament; and I can tell you we’re already on track to raise £2bn this year.”

The Lib Dems have also vowed to put an income tax threshold of £12,500 “on the front page of its next manifesto” up from £10,000.

“Some people have argued that we should change our tax priorities and focus our limited resources on cutting taxes for the wealthiest instead,” said Alexander. “At a time of austerity, this argument simply beggars belief. If we are all in this together, those with the broadest shoulders must bear the greatest burden.

“Fair taxation of the wealthiest is key to our deficit reduction plan. Of course, if a better way can be found to raise the money from this group, I will be willing to consider it. But right now we must focus relentlessly on those who are struggling. And we need to make sure tax owed is tax paid.”

HM Revenue & Customs has confirmed it is taking on an extra 100 officers to target tax abuses in the construction industry.

HMRC said it is doubling the number of specialist officers cracking down on labour providers who fail to pay tax.They are expected to bring in an additional half a billion pounds of tax across all business sectors over the next four years. Labour providers found guilty of tax evasion could face jail.

David Gauke, exchequer secretary to the Treasury, said: “This government has invested £900m in HMRC to crack down on people who break the rules. Expanding these teams will help make sure that we bring in the additional money that the UK needs. Labour providers who think they can exploit their staff and the tax system need to think again.”

Mike Eland, HMRC’s director general of enforcement and compliance, said: “Building on HMRC’s successful approach to tackling fraud in the labour provider industry, these teams will make it even harder for fraudsters.

“Labour providers are traditionally found in agriculture and construction where they supply workers to other businesses. But HMRC will also continue to focus its efforts on all sectors where there is a demand for a flexible workforce to meet seasonal and market demand such as leisure, food, transport, security and cleaning.

“We will tackle fraud by those employers who don’t play by the rules and the organised crime gangs who exploit their workers. We will also work collaboratively with labour users and businesses in these sectors to help them use legitimate providers. This will help to create a level playing field for compliant businesses to compete in the market place.”

This employment tax expert warns companies that there are many labour providers in the Construction Industry who are not legitimate and will cause you more problems than if you engaged the subcontractors on truly self employed terms

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has launched a campaign to target and crack down on suspected fraudulent tax credit claims from the self-employed.

Letters have started to land on the doorsteps of 12,000 self-employed people who are claiming tax credits. HMRC teams have been examining tax credit awards being paid to the self-employed and are writing to any whose claims may not be genuine or accurate. They are asked to contact the department and supply evidence to support their claims.

Failure to tell HMRC promptly of any changes in income can result in overpayment, which means that claimants have to pay back the money. They could also face a penalty and, in the case of deliberate fraud, criminal prosecution and imprisonment.

As part of a wider government crackdown, HMRC and the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) have published a strategy designed to tackle error and fraud in benefits and credits.

Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury David Gauke said:

“HMRC is determined to take a tough approach to targeting possible fraud among tax credit claimants. Last year the Government launched radical proposals to reduce the billions lost to tax credit error and fraud every year. These losses are unaffordable and unacceptable.”
HMRC will now use credit reference agencies and data-matching to spot patterns of fraud. The department is also employing additional investigators and are examining each claim in high-fraud areas.

An engineer working on a contract basis for Airbus UK won his appeal against HMRC’s determination that he should be taxed as an employee under IR35 rules rather than as self-employed.

Following a hearing in Bristol in November, the First Tier Tribunal found in favour of MBF Design Services, the trading company operated by Mark Fitzpatrick. In February 2009, he appealed against HMRC’s decision that his employment status for the years 2001-07 fell within the terms of the Social Security Contributions (Intermediaries) Regulations 2000 and Income Tax (Pay As You Earn) Regulations 2003.

In April 2003 Airbus took on Fitzpatrick and his company MBF under a contract via intermediaries GED-Sitec and Morson Human Resources at an hourly rate that increased if he worked more than 35 hours in a week. The tribunal noted that the “request for services” to which the contract related included a seven-day notice period and a stipulation that substandard service or attendance would give Airbus a legitimate claim to withhold payment.

The Tribunal notes that the contract agreed between Morson and Airbus named 53 individuals and appeared to be based on one normally used for the purchase of goods, with Fitzpatrick’s “quanity” indicated as 42,500 hours at his usual hourly rate.

The third contract between Morson and Airbus also included a clause setting out the client’s right to immediate cancellation of the contract, which was crucial to the tribunal’s decision that the terms were inconsistent with the mutuality of obligation that exists between employee and employer.

During the course of the hearing, one of HMRC’s witnesses, an Airbus design manager, admitted that his statement had been prepared by HMRC and for all those people shocked by this, don’t be, this employment tax expert has seen first hand evidence of HMRC manipulating circumstances to suit their agenda. The Tribunal whilst not doubting his honesty, were not impressed with his evidence.

Noting that in the theoretical circumstances of a contract existing between MBF and Airbus, the judges ruled that the arrangements were typical of a contract for services. On site working was not a conclusive indicator of employment, the judges ruled. The nature of Fitzpatrick’s design work meant it had to be done computers at Airbus’s premises computers, in a similar way that electricians or plumbers frequently work on client sites.

Airbus’s right to cancel the contract without notice indicated a lack of mutuality of obligations, as did a series of occasions during computer failures where contractors were sent home without pay and employees had to remain on-site. Rather than seeking promotions, the contractor had to renegotiate with Airbus if he wanted better terms.

The Tribunal concluded there was insufficient control to demonstrate a contract of service. Any checking and approval of design work was an inevitable necessity of the project work MBF had undertaken.

HMRC have issued an apology noting that the turnaround times for newly self-employed people to register will increase to eight weeks, between now and October 31 2010.

It seems that processing times for paper form 64-8 and registrations for self-assessment will also increase over the next two months.

HMRC staff are being moved to “higher priority work”, hence the delays in processing these forms.

Be very careful during this time to ensure that you are genuinely self employed, whether it be in the construction industry or elsewhere – if in doubt contact us today

Anyone who has a debt with HMRC, whether it be from a Tax Investigation, employer compliance review, employment status review, PAYE/NIC/CIS or Self Assessment you need to take heed of what is happening regarding HMRC debt collection agents.

To begin with, those out in the field are now not allowed to contact HMRC offices to validate the debts that they are being asked to collect. Why you may ask, well there are two very different reasons:
1.The support teams back at base do not have the time to take phone calls – this is the official explanation; or 2. That HMRC is preparing the ground for this work to be given to private debt collection agencies (The Budget announced that a further £500m of debt will be handed over to private agencies). These private agencies, will obviously not be able to phone up HMRC offices and ask for details from confidential records.

HMRC have conducted a bizarre pilot scheme to test whether going down the route of private debt collection agencies would work. Think really bizarre and then carry on reading …

The agencies were given a tranche of work to do, and a control tranche was left with HMRC teams (but was left completely untouched).

and the result, that’s right, the debt collection agencies won!

Fast forward to reality and it will be no surprise that over half of the debts that HMRC debt collectors are given to chase up are in fact incorrect but rather than the onus being on HMRC to prove the debt, these collectors are told that if they are challenged by a “customer” the onus is on the “customer” to prove that HMRC are wrong, which is morally wrong and goes against our judicial system of innocent until proven guilty. So imagine what it’s going to be like with private agencies

All herald the end of IR35, the complex and utterly futile attempt at raising extra revenue by re categorising self employed individuals as deemed employees – not quite! Although the Small Business Minister, Mark Frisk said in an interview with the Daily Telegraph that “Individuals selling their services through small companies have their taxable income policed by the so-called IR35 legislation.This will now be abolished. We want to make sure that we could undertake a comprehensive review of small business taxation in a way that makes the need for the current IR35 legislation redundant.But we want to make sure whatever we change is a lasting settlement. One of the problems with IR35 is that it’s a constantly changing set of rules.”

However, no sooner had he made this statement than people behind the scenes were scurrying around stating that he had NOT said it would be abolished. Now I like plain speaking so when I hear “This will now be abolished” I don’t think there are many areas of confusion but here we go again spin, retraction, review, consultation these are now what those immortal 5 words actually mean, so watch this space because no one who is self employed is off the hook

So in an effort to simplify the tax position of self employed individuals, the Coalition has announced that they are to review IR35, which in theory is good news. Far too much time and money has been taken up with HMRC pursuing employment status reviews that have led absolutely no where. The latest case being that of Novasoft – it only took a mere 8 years to resolve and guess how it started – readers of this blog will as this employment tax expert has warned about it since it began – that helpful little offer by HMRC to review self employed contracts free of charge. All those people who think they can get something for nothing take heed – this whole case stemmed from an unsuspecting person naively thinking that this was the route to go because of course HMRC are completely impartial aren’t they?
Well a mega lesson has been learnt here – the individual may have finally won but it cost him £’000′s and 8 years of his life – a high price to pay, so where do we go from here – well just be very careful reviews are planned, timescale not mentioned and even worse HMRC are carrying on blindly opening tax investigations into new IR35 cases so if you are concerned about your employment status contact the experts because you don’t want to be the next statistic

Announcing that you have a cunning plan to avoid Employers NIC is one thing, telling the world it has HMRC approval is another thing altogether but this is the latest idea by TMS for commission-only  individuals. Now it strikes this employment tax expert that if you were coming out making bold statments regarding guaranteeing someones self employed status that you would cover your bases and realise there is more to employment status than just a contract and trying to ensure that both parties stick to it – we all know what clients are like in practice, something happens from a commercial perspective, so the nature of the relationship changes, do they immediately ring to chat through the contract!!!

So if we are looking at a red rag to a bull from HMRC’s perspective, what will make it even worse:

• Converting existing employees to self employed under this scheme – employment status is not a matter of choice, it is based on the FACTS of the relationship
• Stating that they have received approval on a pilot case – HMRC do not and will not give blanket approval for contracts, it is down to the working practices of each individual case and they will look at them be assured of that (see the comment below from an HMRC spokesman)
• Marketing it so openly and blatantly as cutting payroll overheads and increasing the earnings of the individual  – many would suggest that they are walking the tightrope of planned tax avoidance and we all know HMRC’s views on “agents” using these methods

So where does this leave potentially naive clients – right in the firing line – how much would you pay to be well and truly on HMRC’s radar courtesy of all the publicity? Brace yourselves for some really interesting employer tax compliance visits or tax investigations now that HMRC are well and truly “involved”

And finally,

An HMRC spokesperson said: “HMRC does not give approval to specific business models. In some circumstances, we do provide advice on the tax and National Insurance implications of arrangements when asked to do so. In such circumstances, we look at the facts surrounding that particular example, but as circumstances vary, HMRC would not give that model approval.”