Employment Tax Expert

Tax investigations are taking a new, slightly sinister twist – HMRC are allegedly demanding personal financial records from business people, without proper grounds for suspicion.

This comes about at a time when Section CH223430 of HMRC’s Tax Investigation handbook appears to have “disappeared. Now I know you’ll be asking what the hell is this reference all about, well it tells inspectors that they need to find something significantly wrong, questionable or suspicious in a business’s record (ie they need to ‘break’ the record) before they can demand personal financial details from an owner or director of that business.

A number of people have noticed that this has become worryingly commonplace, Anne Eager, enquiries manager at RJP, stated:

“I have had requests for private bank records from my clients in opening letters. When I challenged the request, the inspector said that it was to save time, as he felt it was very likely there would be issues with the records.

He added it was a ‘standard approach’ under the new regime.”

In other words HMRC are indulging themselves in fishing trips into people’s private bank records. Once HMRC have access to those records every payment into the account would be under suspicion, and it would be for the taxpayer to prove that the payments in do not constitute taxable income. Innocent until proven guilty – not in the tax world!

and what you may ask has happened to Section CH223430 will return , HMRC claim it will return but why was it removed/dropped in the first place?

Anyone who has a debt with HMRC, whether it be from a Tax Investigation, employer compliance review, employment status review, PAYE/NIC/CIS or Self Assessment you need to take heed of what is happening regarding HMRC debt collection agents.

To begin with, those out in the field are now not allowed to contact HMRC offices to validate the debts that they are being asked to collect. Why you may ask, well there are two very different reasons:
1.The support teams back at base do not have the time to take phone calls – this is the official explanation; or 2. That HMRC is preparing the ground for this work to be given to private debt collection agencies (The Budget announced that a further £500m of debt will be handed over to private agencies). These private agencies, will obviously not be able to phone up HMRC offices and ask for details from confidential records.

HMRC have conducted a bizarre pilot scheme to test whether going down the route of private debt collection agencies would work. Think really bizarre and then carry on reading …

The agencies were given a tranche of work to do, and a control tranche was left with HMRC teams (but was left completely untouched).

and the result, that’s right, the debt collection agencies won!

Fast forward to reality and it will be no surprise that over half of the debts that HMRC debt collectors are given to chase up are in fact incorrect but rather than the onus being on HMRC to prove the debt, these collectors are told that if they are challenged by a “customer” the onus is on the “customer” to prove that HMRC are wrong, which is morally wrong and goes against our judicial system of innocent until proven guilty. So imagine what it’s going to be like with private agencies

So in an effort to simplify the tax position of self employed individuals, the Coalition has announced that they are to review IR35, which in theory is good news. Far too much time and money has been taken up with HMRC pursuing employment status reviews that have led absolutely no where. The latest case being that of Novasoft – it only took a mere 8 years to resolve and guess how it started – readers of this blog will as this employment tax expert has warned about it since it began – that helpful little offer by HMRC to review self employed contracts free of charge. All those people who think they can get something for nothing take heed – this whole case stemmed from an unsuspecting person naively thinking that this was the route to go because of course HMRC are completely impartial aren’t they?
Well a mega lesson has been learnt here – the individual may have finally won but it cost him £’000′s and 8 years of his life – a high price to pay, so where do we go from here – well just be very careful reviews are planned, timescale not mentioned and even worse HMRC are carrying on blindly opening tax investigations into new IR35 cases so if you are concerned about your employment status contact the experts because you don’t want to be the next statistic

HMRC have gradually been introducing various penalty changes and “in year” late payment penalties are something new for this tax year but there has been very little publicity about this latest addition to the employer compliance review/tax investigation/Construction Industry Scheme review regime.

So what does this actually mean from both a PAYE/NIC compliance and CIS compliance perspective – well, it means there are no opportunities to hold onto monthly PAYE and CIS payments to HMRC to aide cashflow and then catch up at the year end. Now paying late will register a default and these defaults will be tracked throughout the year and then only after the end of the tax year will penalty notices be issued – because let’s face it this is when HMRC can obtain the highest yield from you. It has already been confirmed that they won’t issue the notices “in year” so don’t think that you have got away with it because it will be stored up for the end of the tax year and then bang, the penalty notices will arrive.

Statistically HMRC will be looking for unusual remittance patterns so don’t go down the misguided route of thinking “how will they find out?” because you’ll be walking into the next stage of the the new compliance regime that of “real time record reviews”. Keep reading for further updates on this very important development …

Announcing that you have a cunning plan to avoid Employers NIC is one thing, telling the world it has HMRC approval is another thing altogether but this is the latest idea by TMS for commission-only  individuals. Now it strikes this employment tax expert that if you were coming out making bold statments regarding guaranteeing someones self employed status that you would cover your bases and realise there is more to employment status than just a contract and trying to ensure that both parties stick to it – we all know what clients are like in practice, something happens from a commercial perspective, so the nature of the relationship changes, do they immediately ring to chat through the contract!!!

So if we are looking at a red rag to a bull from HMRC’s perspective, what will make it even worse:

• Converting existing employees to self employed under this scheme – employment status is not a matter of choice, it is based on the FACTS of the relationship
• Stating that they have received approval on a pilot case – HMRC do not and will not give blanket approval for contracts, it is down to the working practices of each individual case and they will look at them be assured of that (see the comment below from an HMRC spokesman)
• Marketing it so openly and blatantly as cutting payroll overheads and increasing the earnings of the individual  – many would suggest that they are walking the tightrope of planned tax avoidance and we all know HMRC’s views on “agents” using these methods

So where does this leave potentially naive clients – right in the firing line – how much would you pay to be well and truly on HMRC’s radar courtesy of all the publicity? Brace yourselves for some really interesting employer tax compliance visits or tax investigations now that HMRC are well and truly “involved”

And finally,

An HMRC spokesperson said: “HMRC does not give approval to specific business models. In some circumstances, we do provide advice on the tax and National Insurance implications of arrangements when asked to do so. In such circumstances, we look at the facts surrounding that particular example, but as circumstances vary, HMRC would not give that model approval.”