Employment Tax Expert
Were here to help with any Employment Tax Issue
Categories
- Agency Worker Regulations
- Business Record Check
- Car Fleet Savings
- Cars
- Childcare
- Construction Industry
- Disguised remuneration
- EICG.co.uk
- Employer Tax Compliance
- Employment Status
- Employment Tax Expert
- Green Car Issues
- HMRC – what are they up to?
- MPs expenses
- National Insurance Refund
- PAYE End Of Year
- PAYE/NIC
- Penalties
- PSA
- Real Time Information
- Salary Sacrifice
- Tax Avoidance
- Tax Codes
- Tax Disclosure
- Tax Dispute
- Tax Health Plan
- Tax Investigations
- Termination of Employment
- Uncategorized
Links
Recent Articles
- HMRC announce Alternative Tax Dispute Resolution trial for Small and Medium Companies
- HMRC Compliance checks into direct tax avoidance schemes
- HMRC announce new Offshore Tax Co Ordination Unit
- Construction Industry Scheme (“CIS”) Penalties Overhaul
- Tax Health Plan – Update
- Real Time Information for PAYE/NIC will Crash & Burn
- HMRC warn about PAYE/NIC Errors on end of year forms
- Another Tax Disclosure Opportunity – mmmmmmmm!
- HMRC Powers increased in relation to PAYE/NIC
- Pay As You Earn Settlement Agreement payments
-
No Comments
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) is extending the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) tax trial which provides Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) customers with an alternative way of resolving tax disputes in compliance checks.
ADR involves an independent person from HMRC (called a ‘facilitator’), who has not been involved in the dispute before, and who will work with both the customer and the HMRC case owner to try to broker an agreement between them. ADR has proven to be an effective way of resolving tax disputes in a quick and efficient way, not just for tax but in the commercial world as well.
In this stage of the trial, ADR will be available to SME customers, where a tax issue is in dispute, but before an appealable tax decision or assessment has been made by HMRC. Initially this stage of the trial will be limited to customers based in North Wales and North West England.
ADR covers both VAT and direct taxes disputes, and entering into the ADR process will not affect the customer’s existing review and appeal rights.
This employment tax expert says, be careful this is not for everyone. The example situations provided are where HMRC would probably get their backsides kicked if it went to Tribunal, so it will wrap up a case quicker BUT there is the other side of the equation as well and remember this is only open to 2 areas. If you find yourself in this situation, call us today on 0800 917 9176
-
No Comments
The Government’s Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) highlighted the need to adopt a consistent approach across HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) in tackling tax avoidance risk. So what have HMRC done, you would hope tackle the massive corporate tax avoidance schemes that are well known, past and present, but no …… what is the highest risk, you guessed it, SME’s, this employment tax expert despairs.
To address the expectation in the CSR and focus on effectively tackling tax avoidance, HMRC has created four specialist teams to handle compliance checks into direct tax avoidance schemes used by small and medium enterprises (SMEs). SMEs are companies, partnerships or self-employed businesses with a turnover of under £30 million and with less than 250 employees.
The teams are located in:
Central – Stoke
East – various locations
South East – Bournemouth
London and Anglia – LutonHMRC is currently transferring approximately 1,850 ongoing SME compliance checks to these four teams and aims to complete this by the end of January 2012. HMRC customers and their authorised tax agents and advisers (if appropriate) will be advised (in writing) of a change to both case officer and office dealing with the check.
From 1 December 2011, the teams will deal with all SME compliance checks which involve direct tax avoidance risks, so if you find your self in this position, please call us on 0800 917 9176
-
No Comments
HMRC has capped penalties for late returns of payment information to contractors under the Construction Industry Scheme. The scheme has proved controversial with contractors. Since 1 October penalties have been capped at £3,000. Before then, however, penalties for failing to register with the scheme were £100 per month and some penalties could amount to tens of thousands of pounds. In some instances where firms had neglected to register in the first place, they were being hit with notices for £20,000 and more. One firm was landed with a penalty of £80,000, which had built up over a year because the firm had failed to register as a contractor.
The new penalty regime came in on 1 October and only applies to penalties levied since that date however if you are faced with penalties under the old regime, contact us today on o800 917 9176 and we will assist you in mitigating these liabilities
-
No Comments
HMRC has said it will stick to a plan to introduce a ‘real-time’ pay-as-you-earn tax system by 2013, despite concerns from employers and payroll software companies that the timetable is “unachievable”.
As part of a plan to modernise PAYE, which was introduced in 1944, employers will send information about tax and national insurance they deduct from employees’ wages to HMRC when they are made – rather than at the end of the tax year as happens now.
The current system causes overpayments and underpayments of tax because some information is out of date.
RTI timetable
Q: When will it happen?
A: Employers and pension providers will begin to use the RTI service during April-October 2013. All employers will use the RTI service by October 2013.Q: How can employers be sure it will work?
A: HMRC will pilot RTI with volunteer software developers and employers and pension providers for a year, starting in April 2012.Q: How can employers be part of the pilot?
A: Plans for the April 2012 pilot are already well advanced and no additional employer volunteers are needed. However HMRC are looking at how to bring more employers onboard later in the 2012-13 tax year.Q: As an agent who files PAYE submissions for a number of employers, do I need permission from my clients before I could take part?
A: Yes. An agent would need to have the agreement of the client employer.Real-time earnings information could be sent to HMRC automatically using payroll software via the BACS payment network. The new system is expected to be working October 2013.
In a response to an HMRC consultation in December last year, three quarters of respondents who had a view on the proposed timetable for introducing real-time PAYE thought it was “UNACHIEVABLE”.
But in a summary of responses to its consultation document on real-time PAYE information HMRC said the timetable for the introduction of the “universal credit” in 2013 to replace many benefits and tax credits meant “there is no flexibility in terms of the ultimate go-live date of RTI.”
which is quite frankly ridiculous.To help smooth employers’ transition to real-time earnings information HMRC said it would “align its employment records with those of the employers”, hmmmmm and that should be interesting to witness.
Software suppliers told HMRC in the PAYE consultation that the proposed timescale did not allow sufficient time to develop and test products in time for to be ready by April 2012, but did they listen ………….?
In a concession to software companies, HMRC has said that not all software products would need to be ready for real-time PAYE by April 2012. Instead, software products will be tested for one year – starting in April 2012. Software suppliers and employers can volunteer for the scheme.
Karen Thomson, associate director of policy, research and strategic visibility at the Chartered Institute of Payroll Professionals (CIPP), said the trial of the payroll software should flesh out any “anomalies”. Employers who make payroll errors under the new system, such as telling HMRC the wrong hours worked by an employee, or the wrong leaving date from a job, could be responsible for an individual losing their benefit entitlement because the Universal Credit will rely on PAYE information, Thomson said, so a sysytem that 3/4 of respondents thought was being rushed and has a major impact on benefit entitlements, has simply not been thought through and will crash and burn if the existing timescale is pursued
-
No Comments
From 6 April 2012 HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) will be able to ask employers to pay a security where there is serious risk that they won’t pay over their PAYE tax deductions or Class 1 National Insurance contributions (NICs).
so why have HMRC has been given this new power:
According to HMRC businesses have repeatedly told them that they resent the unfair advantage gained by those who don’t meet their tax obligations. HMRC have stated that they are determined to pursue those who won’t pay, to make tax fairer for all. This employment tax expert is a bit more cynical, seeing will be believing as I for one am sick to death of companies going under and then phoenixing again the next day, week or month
HMRC already have the facility to ask for a security for VAT, insurance premium tax (IPT) and environmental taxes, so why has it taken so long to sort out PAYE/NIC?
The required security will usually be either a cash deposit from the business or director – held by HMRC or paid into a joint HMRC/taxpayer bank account – or a bond from an approved financial institution which is payable on demand.
HMRC have stated that they will use securities to tackle the handful of employers who deliberately try to defraud the government. These employers:
deliberately choose not to pay
engage in phoenixism – this is where a business evades tax by becoming insolvent and then sets up a new company the next day to continue trading
have no qualms about building up large PAYE or NICs debts, including penalties
do not respond to HMRC’s attempts to contact themThese employers will have deducted this money from employees’ pay packets under the pretext of paying their employees’ income tax and NICs.
HMRC will calculate the amount of the security on a case by case basis – depending on the amount of tax at risk, the previous behaviour of the employer and other risks. Those being required to pay a security can appeal against this decision.
As with VAT, if an employer fails to provide the security for PAYE or NICs, HMRC can prosecute them. The sanction is a fine, not a custodial sentence.
